11 Comments Already

mygif
David B Said,
June 10th, 2009 @8:08 am  

Is what you’re suggesting a form of brain washing? That what is sounds like to me.

mygif
Brian J OMalley Said,
June 10th, 2009 @8:34 am  

Hi David,

Thanks for your question. The answer is a qualified “yes.” Basically, the process does “wash” the brain of older concepts, but you’re the person choosing what stays and what goes. You can still eat breakfast foods in the morning for example, but you might want to analyze the way you do other things and actively decide what other direction you might want to take rather than follow instinctive patterns instilled by previous learning.

This is an empowerment tool. It puts you in control of how you perceive things and how to best respond to situations. If you engage in road rage, to use another example from the article, you may actively decide that you’re a calm and safe driver at all times. Repeating that decision and reinforcing it over time will eventually replace the earlier idea and behavior.

mygif
kookie Said,
June 10th, 2009 @10:20 am  

Great post!

I’ve been studying Toltec philosophy (through the books of Carlos Castaneda), and one of the FIRST things you learn is that you must turn off the voice inside your head. Not only does that voice lie to you, it reinforces every idea about the world that has been implanted in your mind since birth (like you can’t have sandwiches for breakfast). Once you free yourself of that voice, you can recreate the world (and yourself) in any fashion that is pleasing to you.

It sounds like you have hit upon the same idea through a different path. Isn’t it wonderful that the truth remains true, no matter how you arrive at it?

mygif
Brian J OMalley Said,
June 10th, 2009 @11:24 am  

Kookie,

Thanks for your comments and kindness, and yes, it is interesting how the truth is arrived at via many different paths but remains constant.

I’ve been studying world religions since 1991, and I’m amazed at how very similar the underlying tenets are. I’ve studied about 75 or so, and they basically say the same things. For example, the Native American Code of Right Relationship bears a striking similarity to the Ten Commandments. These cultures could not have influenced one another, and yet they have the same core principles.

I’ve never read Mr. Castaneda, but many of my friends have encouraged me to, because our findings do seem to resonate. Although I came to my system and conclusions through the study of neurology and psychology, I’m finding that there are growing corollaries between science and philosophical belief systems.

I happen to be a meditator of more than 15 years, so this may explain why the system has worked very well for me, because meditation is essentially the same as “turning the voice off.” However, I just checked with my other subjects, and they don’t meditate, so the system seems to work in either condition. My suspicion is that it will work faster and be more complete with the addition of meditation, which I recommend to everyone.

For the skeptics out there, Kookie has highlighted something very important in her comment that I didn’t cover in the article. Much of what we call “common sense” has no validity whatsoever. If you were born 400 years ago, it was common sense to believe the world was flat and situated in the middle of the universe. Three hundred years ago, voices being transmitted over thin air into a box would have been witchcraft, but now we call that box a radio or a television. In either case, proponents of the truth would have found themselves at the business end of a rope!

mygif
kookie Said,
June 10th, 2009 @1:39 pm  

That’s absolutely correct, Brian. The Toltecs say you should ‘believe without believing’…meaning that you can believe what you want, but don’t buy into it 100% because new evidence could always surface to make your beliefs invalid…and if that happens you should never be afraid to challenge your own belief system (even if it means making a complete 180).

As far as meditation goes, I think that is a good way to turn off the voice, as long as the practitioner is disciplined… the Toltecs prefer a system of movements called Tensegrity (which is a lot like T’ai Chi). I haven’t mastered that yet, so I just use good old fashioned exercise. Whatever works for you, is best, I suppose.

I think the neurology/psychology angle is fascinating. We humans consider ourselves so advanced and yet we haven’t begun to scratch the surface of understanding how the mind and body work together.

mygif
Brian J OMalley Said,
June 10th, 2009 @6:03 pm  

Kookie,

This is starting to evolve into an interesting conversation, because there are so many parallels.

Regarding the system I’ve devised, it has four main components:

1. Expressing an ideal — what is your raison d’etre? Why are you doing anything at all? What are you attempting to be?

2. What are you certain about? — These certainties are absolutely unshakable beliefs about yourself. What attributes do you have that you are unquestionionably certain about and of service to the ideal? These are always expressed with the predicate, “I am … ” The user is asked to refine these ideas from the spiritual level to mental attributes and finally to physical reality.

3. My Focus Today — These are the aspects of the ideal and the certainties that you will meditate upon today when the chance arises. The idea is to replace the thoughts that randomly enter your attention with one that benefits you most today.

4. Thoughts/Gratitude — Here I ask the user to express the current situation from the perspective of a higher viewpoint - maybe that of a guardian angel who is quietly observing in a loving and non-judgemental way. The user is encouraged to be thankful for the tools at his or her disposal to move the situation in a positive direction. The idea here is to provide the perspective that we currently only seem to acquire through the passage of time. If we apply it today however, obstacles seem less formidable and a path can be found more easily thus reducing stress that is unproductive and misleading.

My concept is not entirely psychological/physiological, although the repeated use of the above will have those effects. The instructions are at least partly based upon the Kabbalah, the ancient wisdom school of the Hermetics, the writing of Edgar Cayce and the Tao te Ching.

I work out and was a former long-distance runner, and while these states do stop the flow of thought, I found them both to be unreliable because we’re inducing a release of endorphins. Essentially, we’re drugged on our internal chemicals. I think yoga, t’ai chi and other physical expressions that rely less on physical stress to the body will be more effective. Since t’ai chi is interested mostly in energy, I think it is the premier method I’ve seen to date.

I don’t know anything about Tensegrity, but now I have a new avenue to explore! Thanks so much for that and your great comments!

mygif
kookie Said,
June 10th, 2009 @9:18 pm  

That’s really interesting to me. I hadn’t thought of being ‘drugged by endorphins’. It IS so much easier to stop your thoughts while exercising intensely than it is while sitting still. Now that I know what it feels like, I should try harder to duplicate that state of mind while at rest…I’ve only managed to accomplish it for a few minutes at a time (while resting).

I like the system you devised. It is something that anyone (at least anyone with the will and desire) can employ. Which, of course, always leads me to the question that plagues me day and night…why aren’t more people interested in this sort of self-examination? Why are most people content to live their lives the same way day after day, even when they acknowledge that they are miserable? Why do they suffer needlessly in the prison of their own making..especially when the way out is readily available?

According to the Toltecs, the person who seeks out this sort of knowledge, is a Warrior. A Warrior who only battles himself…his fears…his inner voice…his personal foibles. I’ve found this way of thinking (using the methods Castaneda described in his books) has truly been the path to a joyful life, free of stress and worry. If more people would truly look at their lives and the options for change that are actually available to them, they would be amazed at how much happier they would be.

ps-I haven’t read much about the Hermetics, but now my curiosity is piqued. Must do some research on that subject. :)

mygif
Brian J OMalley Said,
June 11th, 2009 @7:56 am  

Kookie,

You’re asking great questions and making wonderful points, and I really appreciate it. Thank you.

With regard to people’s willingness for self-examination, the established neural network has a lot to do with it, but there’s also the socialization factor. There’s a desire to fit in and be the same as everyone else. Ironically, if you look at it entirely from a scientific perspective, this is impossible. The human race is simultaneously different from one another while being the same. The difference between races for example comprises only a tiny fraction of our DNA sequence (I can’t remember the exact figure but it’s something like 1 percent or less), yet that tiny variation is wildly varied with regard to looks, personality, intelligence, etc. No two human beings are exactly the same any more than any two snowflakes. Yet, how much time do we concentrate on that tiniest of fractions of difference? Too much.

There does seem to be a growing number of people who are interested in self-examination and exploration though. The New Age genre is the most profitable category of book publishing now.

The biggest problem I have with many of the self-help and New Age books is their failure to address the previously established neural network that has an enormous grip on each one of us. The new ideas are very good, but until that physical connection in the brain is modified with sufficient practice, the helpful concepts in these books will have almost no chance of taking hold on a permanent basis. The basic biology won’t permit it.

That’s why I came up with this system, and why I’ve started to write a book about the lessons that science can offer in this regard. Yes, anyone can use it, and the methodology I ask people to use is akin to meditation in that it blocks out the other ideas. Want to try it?

Look up “Kybalion” on Google. It’s the basis of Hermetic teachings, and you’ll probably find it at a Free Mason site. What’s interesting is that this 4,000 (or so?) year old teaching says, “Nothing rests; everything moves; everything vibrates.” Einstein’s relativity theory said the same thing in 1905. (e=mc^2, therefore m=e/c^2; which says all mass is energy; energy vibrates.)

mygif
kookie Said,
June 12th, 2009 @11:39 am  

It’s utterly fascinating to me to think that it’s the early establishment of the neural network that keeps people in their mindsets….even when presented with evidence that what they think might be wrong (or at least that there is another way of thinking that they could try).

Do you really think it is just a matter of concerted effort and practice that can rewire the brain? We’re talking years and years of programming that starts from birth that would have to be ripped out and examined. By the time most people come to the realization that their lives aren’t what they’d hoped for, aren’t people very much set in their ways?

Stopping your inner monologue, and striving to live a more purposeful and fulfilling life is one thing…anyone can do that…especially if they use a system like the one you outlined…but rewiring the brain? That seems more complicated.

As for me, I don’t think I’m cut out for meditation. Granted, I don’t know a lot about it…but I have a ‘violent nature’ (as my Toltec benefactor would say), and sitting still for any length of time makes me crazy. That’s one of the reasons that the path of the Toltec Warrior is my destiny.

mygif
Brian J OMalley Said,
June 12th, 2009 @2:13 pm  

Kookie,

I think the most common example are people born into poverty. Many never escape, because their upbringing set ideas in their minds that poverty is impossible to overcome. Another example are cults. Adopting the thought pattern of a group can radically change a person’s personality and behavior.

The human brain is exceptionally adept at changing (or what medical personnel call plasticity). The frontal cortex allows this to occur, and human beings have the most developed frontal cortex of any species.

People rewire their brains all the time. Everytime we learn anything at all, a small rewiring process goes on. On the larger scale it is more time consuming, but we do it.

The past patterns don’t have to be examined. The brain will not permit two mutually exclusive ideas to exist simultaneously. Now, some people do accomplish that by using bizarre rationalization to allow what to an objective person would be mutually exclusive concepts, but without that rationalization as the bridge, the brain will not permit the one that is not held strongly - the one strongly implanted by the frontal cortex.

That’s how my system works. You hold the idea strongly in the frontal cortex for many days. The old ideas have to give way to these new ones.

So far I have six subjects using it for a little more than two weeks, and all have reported positive changes. More importantly, these changes are written and directed by them instead of the past.

mygif
kookie Said,
June 12th, 2009 @2:24 pm  

I see! It’s like how they say that you can’t ‘get rid’ of an existing bad habit; you can only replace it with a good habit. That makes a lot of sense.

Related Post

Email addresses are required to prevent potential spamming activity only. Your email address will never appear with your comments nor be sold or used for any commercial purpose.

Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: All comments are moderated by our authors. Offensive comments will not be approved and will not appear.

Please Take Our Poll

  • Who's more to blame for the economy? Bush or Obama?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Top Commentators

    • No Commenters Yet This Month

Categories

Search

Archives

Pages

Links